|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 7 post(s) |

Pelea Ming
Prostitutes Are Always Wlling Care Factor
311
|
Posted - 2013.08.02 16:52:00 -
[1] - Quote
SHield tanks are still notably more powerful then armor tanks for a variety of reasons, why not give shield reps a slightly smaller boost then armor reps? |

Pelea Ming
Prostitutes Are Always Wlling Care Factor
313
|
Posted - 2013.08.03 00:21:00 -
[2] - Quote
Xequecal wrote:Pelea Ming wrote:SHield tanks are still notably more powerful then armor tanks for a variety of reasons, why not give shield reps a slightly smaller boost then armor reps? Like, say, 10%? or 12.5%? Aside from the ancillary shield boosters (which aren't getting buffed) and the Gist line of shield boosters, which also aren't getting boosted, shield really isn't better than armor. it's an arguable point, since for the same amount of raw HP, shield doesn't have to give up speed/agility, and also has passive regen, while armor is only gaining not having it's sig rad boosted by some mods/rigs.
Oh, yea, and armor reps typically have higher cap drain to them.
Also, even CCP acknowledges that shield is overall all somewhat superior to armor tank, hence the attempted addressing of that balance by introducing AARs and that overly-cap hungry resistance shifting hardner (the latter of which has still overwhelmingly been proven to be useless in PvP despite attempts to 'balance' it).
(and from my own experience, because of it's cap need, usually useless in PvE on anything smaller then a BS) |

Pelea Ming
Prostitutes Are Always Wlling Care Factor
313
|
Posted - 2013.08.03 02:31:00 -
[3] - Quote
Sigras, your first fail was not just ignoring Vyktor's fail... your second was replying to it. :P
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Seriously, though, it was rather humorous and I'm glad you pointed it out as I'd overlooked it before though, thanks for the laughs! And, seriously, the Zealot should get a range bonus instead of that cap need bonus, just give it's base cap a buff. |

Pelea Ming
Prostitutes Are Always Wlling Care Factor
313
|
Posted - 2013.08.03 19:42:00 -
[4] - Quote
Is it just me, or does this Vyktor guy's posts seem to be horrible troll? |

Pelea Ming
Prostitutes Are Always Wlling Care Factor
314
|
Posted - 2013.08.03 21:35:00 -
[5] - Quote
I still find it hilarious I can put a stronger active tank on a Legion then I can on an Abaddon :P |

Pelea Ming
Prostitutes Are Always Wlling Care Factor
314
|
Posted - 2013.08.04 00:13:00 -
[6] - Quote
Shinzhi Xadi wrote:Pelea Ming wrote:I still find it hilarious I can put a stronger active tank on a Legion then I can on an Abaddon :P Old Tech 1 ship, vs ultra modern Tech 3 ship..
Still a Cruiser vs a Battleship. Kind of obscene that it overall takes less incoming damage (sig rad / speed tank) yet can also be fitted out to rep more armor per second. |

Pelea Ming
Prostitutes Are Always Wlling Care Factor
315
|
Posted - 2013.08.04 14:11:00 -
[7] - Quote
I don't think that AAR's should use no cap... but I think having them use less cap would be a good idea. |

Pelea Ming
Prostitutes Are Always Wlling Care Factor
316
|
Posted - 2013.08.04 18:57:00 -
[8] - Quote
Pheadra Aurilen wrote:CCP Fozzie wrote:
You are correct, that's a detail that I had missed and since the rep bonus increase from T2 to DG boosters is twice as much as the rep bonus increase from T2 to DB armor reps it probably means the DG/CN boosters need to get excluded from this change. Gonna do some more thinking and get back to you.
I'm not sure that this would be the right move. Excluding DG/CN boosters from the buff would actually make them less Cap efficient than T2 or Meta 4 boosters and would mean that their Cap efficiency was only fractionally above Meta 3. Similarly, excluding large and X-large Pith boosters means that the C-Type large or X-large boosters would be less cap efficient than T2. The reason for this is that large and X-large Pith boosters aren't actually out of step with armour reppers, but actually follow the same pattern of increasing the boost amount by 10% of the boost provided by the equivalent faction booster on each step (Faction to C-Type to B-Type to A-Type) for the same activation cost. The only significant difference being the existence of an X-Type booster for each size for which there is no armour equivalent. Clearly, excluding any part of this chain from a 15% increase in boost amount is going to create some odd overlaps and inconsistencies. However, the same is not true for small and medium Pith boosters or for any size of Gist booster. For these the gap between the faction boosters and deadspace boosters is huge. For example, small and medium C-Type Pith boosters give almost twice the boost of DG/CN for the same activation cost (albeit with a slightly longer cycle time) and for Gist C-Type the activation cost is significant reduced (up to 33%) whilst the boost amount increases (11%-85%!) compared to the equivalent Domi/RF modules. These are clearly unbalanced. IMO the correct course of action would therefor be to include faction, large and X-large Pith boosters in the 15% increase to boost amount, but exclude small and medium Pith and all Gist boosters. Ideally, I would also completely overhaul to Gist and small and medium Pith boosters to bring them in line with other local reppers. However, I accept that with so much isk invested in these modules it will be a thankless task and, perhaps, too much to expect on this occasion. Or you could reduce the cap draw abit on the large & x-large pith boosters. |

Pelea Ming
Prostitutes Are Always Wlling Care Factor
316
|
Posted - 2013.08.04 22:08:00 -
[9] - Quote
Sergeant Acht Scultz wrote:Pelea Ming wrote:Shinzhi Xadi wrote:Pelea Ming wrote:I still find it hilarious I can put a stronger active tank on a Legion then I can on an Abaddon :P Old Tech 1 ship, vs ultra modern Tech 3 ship.. Still a Cruiser vs a Battleship. Kind of obscene that it overall takes less incoming damage (sig rad / speed tank) yet can also be fitted out to rep more armor per second. And a Daredevil with single AAR decent prop mod and some thinking can tank an entire fleet of battleships shooting at it. It's unfair, a frigate should not be able to tank or rep that much neither, amirite? Edit: just in case you haven't noticed this sort of intelligent thinking is about the same level than the T3/BS comment, /sarcasm The frigate isn't out repping a larger hull though, the legion is ... by 2 size categories, in fact. |

Pelea Ming
Prostitutes Are Always Wlling Care Factor
317
|
Posted - 2013.08.05 16:19:00 -
[10] - Quote
W0lf Crendraven wrote:Just for info, you can get over 6k active armour tank from a legion, and 6.7k from a abaddon.
Shield tank is in no way op, nor is armour tank underpowered, people who think that simply dont pvp much (or only do it in blobs). Yes, crystals give shield tankers an edge but nobles arent bad either and armour is way more cap efficient.
A pimped out astarte for example has less burst tank then a pimped sleipnir but due to pith x type cap consumtion it tanks quite a lot more overall. And if the sleipnir uses gist boosters it loses the edge and the armour tank simply tanks more.
And with the link changes a asb sleip tanks 3.8k dps with per asb with tengu links, hg crystals and a strong blue pill, that is already less then what a pimped armour tanker can tank, gets even weirder if you start to favor in the cycle time, 60 sec reload, ca 33 secs of boost per booster = a under 2k dps tank in reality. And thats with the best implants/links in game.
And while that sleipnir with heat reaches a 2.5k active tank, or a 5k burst tank with pith x a blinged hyperion (no officer stuff) can easily top 9k (again with nerfed links).
A fully blinged maelstrom tanks even less.
Armour tank is already superior to a shield tank in most situations on tq (a dual masb hawk for example reps in reality less then a dualrep incursus).
(all numbers with current propsed link/rep changes) SPecifically, I'm referring to Level 4 mission running fits, and no, to fit an abbadon with enough resists/damage/etc, a comparably fit Legion easily will out-rep it. |
|

Pelea Ming
Prostitutes Are Always Wlling Care Factor
317
|
Posted - 2013.08.06 15:33:00 -
[11] - Quote
Wolf, when you decide to start talking real fits, that's fine, but no abaddon is going to go self repping for over 6k hp/s. |

Pelea Ming
Prostitutes Are Always Wlling Care Factor
317
|
Posted - 2013.08.06 22:12:00 -
[12] - Quote
Harvey James wrote:Pelea Ming wrote:Wolf, when you decide to start talking real fits, that's fine, but no abaddon is going to go self repping for over 6k hp/s. Abbadon's pitiful cap recharge makes it not even worth bothering with surely I agree, and it's something I've been bashing away at to CCP for several months now, even tried involving the CSM, and the heart of the response overall I seem to get is "go F* off, we don't want to be bothered about it." |

Pelea Ming
Prostitutes Are Always Wlling Care Factor
317
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 05:20:00 -
[13] - Quote
you don't even pay attention to what's being said. No properly fit, (regardless of how expensive) Abaddon is going to rep 6k hp/s.
Yet you, yet again, just said it does. |

Pelea Ming
Prostitutes Are Always Wlling Care Factor
317
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 14:22:00 -
[14] - Quote
Sigras wrote:GeneralNukeEm wrote:Pelea Ming wrote:no abaddon is going to go self repping for over 6k hp/s. I'm only a skilless orbit-F1 nullsec supercap blobber and thus don't actually care about elite solo pvp active tanks, but you could at least try applying the scientific method (aka look in EFT) and seeing whether your claims are true. http://i.imgur.com/NloMzDx.jpg (current TQ stats) Overloaded it tanks ~over 9000~ DPS. It appears that you misquoted the lady Pelea Ming wrote:you don't even pay attention to what's being said. No properly fit, (regardless of how expensive) Abaddon is going to rep 6k hp/s. Now returning to your picture . . . if you think that is a proper fit you do not belong in PL Thank you very much for pointing that out, and again, I stick to my original statement, to wit, proper fit. |

Pelea Ming
Prostitutes Are Always Wlling Care Factor
317
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 23:13:00 -
[15] - Quote
Seriously, something still needs to be done in regards to cap on the armor reppers. |

Pelea Ming
Prostitutes Are Always Wlling Care Factor
317
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 00:11:00 -
[16] - Quote
Not to rain on anyone's parade, but you do realize that so far, the 'tweaks' to various weapon systems have had the net effect of making them more powerful... I don't see, therfor, that making shield/armor reps abit more powerful as a bad thing. |

Pelea Ming
Prostitutes Are Always Wlling Care Factor
317
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 01:10:00 -
[17] - Quote
I also rather liked how one must assume he finds anything larger then 1v1 to be a blob :P |
|
|
|